Skip to content

How Islam spread: 610 to 1924

Between 632 and 750 the armies of three successive caliphates took Persia, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, North Africa, Spain, Sindh and Transoxiana. Roughly ten million square kilometres in four generations. No empire before or since expanded that fast, and the mechanism was not preaching.

The sentence that gets taught instead is “Islam spread through trade.” That sentence is true of Indonesia, Malaysia, coastal East Africa and much of the Sahel. It is not true of the countries where most Muslims live, and it is not what happened to the civilisations that were there first.

Both halves of the map belong on this page. Presenting only the second half is the propaganda. Presenting only the first half would be the mirror image of it, and would be wrong.

The two mechanisms, and where each one operated

Section titled “The two mechanisms, and where each one operated”
The coreThe rim
WhereArabia, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, North Africa, Spain, Sindh, Central Asia, Anatolia, the BalkansIndonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, coastal East Africa, much of the Sahel
When622 to 750, then Anatolia 1071 to 14538th to 16th centuries
HowConquest by field army, tribute imposed on the survivors, conversion over generations under legal and fiscal pressureMerchants, Sufi orders, dynastic marriage, rulers converting and their subjects following
ResultZoroastrian Persia, Christian North Africa, Christian Egypt, Christian Anatolia, Buddhist Central Asia: gone or reduced to remnantsHindu-Buddhist Java and Sumatra converted without a conquering army

Indonesia is the largest Muslim country on earth and it was not conquered. That is the strongest fact the other side has, it is real, and the scholarship is not seriously divided about it: Islam arrived in the archipelago with Gujarati and Persian traders from the thirteenth century, spread through Sufi teachers and the conversion of local rulers, and the first sultanate at Samudra Pasai grew out of a trading port rather than a garrison.

Hold that next to Persia. In 633 the Sassanid Empire was four centuries old and Zoroastrian. By 651 it did not exist. Today there are roughly twenty thousand Zoroastrians left in Iran.

Same religion. Two completely different processes. The word “spread” is doing the work of concealing which one happened where.

  1. Muhammad and Arabia, 622 to 632. Medina, the campaigns against Mecca and the Arabian tribes, the expulsion and destruction of the Jewish tribes of the Hijaz.
  2. The Ridda wars, 632 to 633. Abu Bakr’s campaign against the tribes that tried to leave after Muhammad’s death. Islam’s first war was fought against apostates, and it established the principle that leaving is not permitted.
  3. The Rashidun conquests, 633 to 661. Persia, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Libya. The two decisive battles are Yarmouk against the Byzantines in 636 and Qadisiyyah against the Sassanids in the same year.
  4. The Umayyad expansion, 661 to 750. The Maghreb to the Atlantic, Spain from 711, Sindh from 711, Transoxiana under Qutayba ibn Muslim from 705. Stopped in France in 732 and outside Constantinople in 718.
  5. The Abbasid consolidation, 750 to 1258. Less new conquest, more institutionalisation: the legal architecture of dhimma, the slave trades, the Turkic slave-soldier system that eventually took the caliphate over.
  6. The Turkic and Mongol-successor conquests, 1071 to 1526. Anatolia after Manzikert, India under the Ghaznavids, the Delhi Sultanate, the Mughals.
  7. The Ottoman centuries, 1354 to 1924. The Balkans, Constantinople in 1453, the devshirme, and the last caliphate, abolished by Atatürk on 3 March 1924.
  8. The African jihad states, 1670 to 1903. Not medieval at all: Usman dan Fodio’s jihad founded the Sokoto Caliphate in 1804, which ran on slave raiding until the British ended it in 1903.

Because we are in it. The Jewish tribes of the Hijaz are the first entry in phase one, Babylonian Jewry ended in the Farhud and the expulsions, and the 850,000 Jews driven out of Arab and Muslim countries after 1948 are the last chapter of a legal relationship that began in the seventh century. You cannot explain the second without the first.

And because the argument made against Israel every day is that a people cannot claim land it took by force in living memory. That argument is made from countries whose own borders were drawn by cavalry in the 640s, whose majority religion arrived in a supply train, and whose indigenous populations are the remnant communities in the table above.