Skip to content
Shoresh Wiki

Hasbara

Hebrew: הַסְבָּרָה

Hebrew for explanation: Israel’s public diplomacy, the effort to make its case to the world. Critics wield it as a sneer (“that’s just hasbara”), but it means advocacy, the thing every country does for itself.

Etymology and precise meaning

Section titled “Etymology and precise meaning”

Hasbara comes from the Hebrew root ס-ב-ר (samech-bet-resh), the same root as lehasbir, “to explain” or “to clarify.” It is not a cognate of English “propaganda” and carries none of that word’s connotation of falsehood by design. The term names a category of activity, explanatory public diplomacy, not a specific claim, technique, or institution. It sits alongside ordinary terms every state uses for the same function: the US State Department calls its version “public diplomacy,” the UK has the British Council, and Qatar built and bankrolled Al Jazeera as an instrument of its own foreign policy. Israel’s version has simply kept its Hebrew name in English usage.

History of the term’s usage

Section titled “History of the term’s usage”

Israel’s government has run explanatory outreach since before statehood: the Jewish Agency’s information department briefed foreign journalists and diplomats through the 1930s and 1940s Mandate period, and the term hasbara entered common use after 1948 as the young state’s Foreign Ministry built a dedicated information apparatus to counter Arab League propaganda in the UN and international press. Usage expanded after the Six-Day War of 1967, when Israel faced growing scrutiny over the territories it now administered, and again after the Second Intifada began in 2000, when Palestinian media strategy and Israeli casualties from suicide bombings both became global news in real time. The social media era sharpened the fight further: in 2017 the pro-Israel nonprofit Act.IL launched an app coordinating volunteers to flag antisemitic content and boost pro-Israel messaging online, which critics quickly branded “hasbara” in the pejorative sense and which the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab studied as a case of organized, if transparent, astroturfing in August 2019.

How the word is misused, and what accurate usage looks like

Section titled “How the word is misused, and what accurate usage looks like”

In pro-Israel usage, hasbara simply names the explanatory case: why the state exists, how it defends itself, what the historical and legal record actually shows. In hostile usage, the word has been inverted into a slur that pre-empts argument: label a fact “hasbara” and a listener is cued to dismiss it without checking it, the same move critics make when they call inconvenient reporting “propaganda” regardless of its sourcing. That inversion feeds directly into the Livingstone Formulation, where any defense of Israel gets recast as evidence of bad faith rather than engaged. It also feeds a specific viral myth, the claim that ordinary defenders of Israel online are secretly salaried, usually cited as “$7,000 a post” with no verifiable payroll, contract, or paper trail ever produced; see Are people paid $7,000 a post to defend Israel online? for the debunk, and the Act.IL article for the one real, openly disclosed volunteer campaign the myth usually distorts into evidence of a hidden industry.

The honest concession: hasbara, like any public diplomacy, includes spin, selective emphasis, and talking points, exactly as every government’s communications operation does. What distinguishes advocacy from the “astroturfing” charge is disclosure: a foreign ministry openly explaining its country’s actions is doing hasbara in the literal, defensible sense; a coordinated campaign that hides its origin or pays participants to pose as independent citizens is doing something else, and that distinction, not the word itself, is what critics should be arguing about.

Section titled “Related pages”

Sources

Section titled “Sources”