Skip to content
Shoresh Wiki

Oslo Accords (Areas A, B, C)

The interim agreements of 1993 to 1995 between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) that created the Palestinian Authority and divided the West Bank into three zones: Area A under full Palestinian control, Area B under Palestinian civil and joint security control, and Area C under Israeli control. They were meant as a five-year step toward a final deal that later talks never reached.

Etymology and the two agreements

Section titled “Etymology and the two agreements”

“Oslo” is Oslo, Norway, where secret back-channel talks between Israeli academics and PLO officials ran through the spring and summer of 1993, hosted by Norwegian diplomats Terje Rød-Larsen and Mona Juul. Those talks produced the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements, signed on the White House lawn on 13 September 1993 by Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat, with a handshake brokered by President Clinton. That first accord, Oslo I, laid out the framework and created the Palestinian Authority but did not yet divide the West Bank into zones. The territorial division came two years later, in the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement signed in Washington on 28 September 1995, known as Oslo II, negotiated on the Israeli side chiefly by government attorney Joel Singer. Oslo II is where Areas A, B and C were defined for the first time, spelled out in the agreement’s annexes and maps.

The precise scope of each zone

Section titled “The precise scope of each zone”

Area A covers the Palestinian population centers, Jenin, Nablus, Tulkarm, Qalqilya, Ramallah, Bethlehem and most of Hebron, roughly 18% of West Bank land, where the Palestinian Authority runs civil administration and internal security and the Israeli military does not routinely enter. Area B, about 22% of the land, covers hundreds of Palestinian towns and villages under PA civil administration but joint Israeli-Palestinian security control. Area C, roughly 60% of the West Bank by land area, remains under full Israeli civil and security control: it holds the Israeli settlements, the Jordan Valley, main roads and connecting infrastructure, and most unregistered state land, but it is the most sparsely populated of the three zones. Together Areas A and B, though a minority of the territory, hold the large majority of the West Bank’s roughly three million Palestinians.

Meant as interim, not final

Section titled “Meant as interim, not final”

The Oslo II text set a five-year transitional period, expiring in May 1999, during which further Israeli redeployments were supposed to shrink Area C and hand progressively more territory to the PA, pending a permanent-status agreement on Jerusalem, the right of return, borders and settlements. The Second Intifada, which erupted in September 2000 after the Camp David and Taba talks failed to close a final deal, froze further transfers. The three-zone map that was supposed to be a five-year scaffold is, in 2026, still the operative division of the West Bank, more than three decades after Oslo I and roughly a generation past the date it was meant to expire.

Misuse in propaganda today

Section titled “Misuse in propaganda today”

Activists frequently describe the zone system as a network of disconnected “apartheid” enclaves or bantustans, treating the whole West Bank as though it were under uniform Israeli lockdown. That elides the basic fact that Areas A and B, home to the large majority of West Bank Palestinians, are policed, taxed and administered day to day by the PA’s own institutions, not Israel; the occupation debate turns on Area C and the settlements, not on Ramallah or Nablus. The opposite error, treating “West Bank” and “Area C” as interchangeable, understates how much of the territory Palestinians actually self-govern. The accurate usage keeps the two facts together: Area C is where Israeli control and settlement activity are concentrated and where the legality question actually bites, while Areas A and B, most of the population, function as a Palestinian-run polity in practice, however unresolved its final borders remain.

Section titled “Related pages”

Sources

Section titled “Sources”