Skip to content

Right of Return

The demand that Palestinian refugees and their descendants “return” to the homes and land they left in what is now Israel. In Arabic the term is haqq al-awda (حق العودة). Roughly 700,000 Palestinian Arabs were displaced in the 1948 war that followed Arab rejection of the UN Partition Plan and the invasion of five Arab armies. UNRWA now counts their descendants as roughly 5.9 million registered “refugees.” Applied to Israel itself, inside the pre-1967 Green Line, rather than to a future Palestinian state, the demand would import a population several times Israel’s Arab citizenry and erase the Jewish majority that is the country’s reason for existing.

The phrase draws its legal weight from UN General Assembly Resolution 194, adopted 11 December 1948, whose paragraph 11 called for refugees “wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours” to be permitted to do so “at the earliest practicable date,” with compensation for those who chose not to. The resolution is a non-binding recommendation, not a Security Council mandate, and its return clause was explicitly conditioned on peaceful intent, a condition Arab governments and Palestinian factions have invoked the resolution while ignoring. Bernadotte’s UN mediation report, filed September 1948 weeks before his assassination, documents the crisis mid-war. Historian Benny Morris’s archival research, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited, established the 1948 exodus was a mix of flight from combat, expulsion by Israeli forces in specific towns, and evacuation orders from Arab commanders expecting quick victory, not a single premeditated Israeli plan; see how much of the exodus was flight and how much was expulsion.

Since the 1960s the term has functioned less as a legal claim than a political one. The PLO and later Hamas invoked it to reject any settlement leaving a Jewish-majority state intact, insisting “return” applies to all of pre-1948 Palestine rather than to a Palestinian state alongside Israel. At the 2000 Camp David summit and again at Taba in 2001, Israeli negotiators offered symbolic return for a limited number plus compensation for the rest; Yasser Arafat rejected any formula without unlimited return, a sticking point historians on both sides cite among the reasons the talks collapsed.

No other refugee population on earth is treated this way. Under the 1951 Refugee Convention, administered by UNHCR for every other refugee group, status is personal and lapses once a durable solution, resettlement, naturalization, or the end of the conditions causing flight, is reached under the Article 1C cessation clauses. UNRWA, created in 1949 specifically for Palestinians, instead passes refugee status down through the male line indefinitely, so a great-grandchild born in Amman who never set foot in Israel is registered the same as a grandparent who fled Haifa in 1948. See refugee vs. descendant and why camps still exist after 75 years. The comparison Israel’s defenders raise is deliberate: roughly 850,000 Jews were also expelled or fled Arab and Muslim countries after 1948, absorbed largely by Israel, and no government or UN agency has ever asserted a parallel Jewish right of return to Baghdad, Cairo, or Tripoli.

In practice the demand now functions as a maximalist bargaining position and a BDS movement plank, one of the “three demands” (alongside ending the “occupation” and full equality for Arab citizens) that BDS founders have said would, together, end Israel as a Jewish state rather than resolve the conflict alongside one. See the full treatment of the five-million-refugees figure and how UNRWA’s count was built, and was 1948 ethnic cleansing for the underlying dispute the term is meant to settle by assertion.