Media & Wikipedia bias
Documented editing and framing patterns on Israel-related articles, with links to verify today’s versions.
- Wikipedia bias: The terror label, buried at the bottom of the lead
- Wikipedia bias: The inconvenient qualifier, dropped
- Wikipedia bias: The accusation gets its own dedicated article
- Wikipedia bias: The alarm over antisemitism, reframed as a weapon
- Wikipedia bias: Contested deaths, decided by the title
- Wikipedia bias: Same role, opposite words
- Wikipedia bias: The Jewish story, softened
- Wikipedia bias: Indigenous when it suits
- Wikipedia bias: One side’s crimes are facts; the other’s are “allegations”
- Wikipedia bias: Whose bias gets flagged
- Wikipedia bias: Asserted as Israel’s guilt, in Wikipedia’s own voice
- Wikipedia bias: Pre-debunked: the pro-Israel claim as “conspiracy”
- Wikipedia bias: Israel’s existence itself, as an open question
- Wikipedia bias: “Denial”, a category built for one side
- Wikipedia bias: The mirror: where the Islamic record gets softened
- Wikipedia bias: ⑯ Scrubbed from the entire article
- Wikipedia bias: ⑰ Buried: the lead says nothing, the body says it constantly
- Wikipedia bias: ⑱ The center of the topic: the articles everyone reads
- Wikipedia bias: ⑲ The framing articles: where the words themselves are defined
- Wikipedia bias: ⑳ 1948, the property fight, and the Jewish side of the ledger
- Wikipedia bias: ㉑ The deep tail: where the word went to zero
- Wikipedia bias: ㉒ The organizations: what the group was called
- Wikipedia bias: ㉓ Reviewed in the sweep
Every page in this section
Section titled “Every page in this section”- Reach: the audit weighted by who actually reads it WikiProject Palestine’s own report: 1,000 articles, 17,476,842 views in June 2026. Of the hundred most-read, 68 carry findings in our ledger, and those 68 hold 77% of the readership.
- The propagandist’s playbook, live-debate edition The recurring moves used to defend anti-Israel claims in live debate, named and countered. A reader who knows the move before hearing it cannot be captured by it.
- The edits no word count can catch Six structural detectors run over Wikipedia’s contested and Top-importance articles: 53 findings. The PLO stopped being militant and became the official representative of Palestinians, Marwan Barghouti stopped being convicted of murder, and a Hamas co-founder now indexes as a politician born in 1945.