Skip to content
Shoresh Wiki

Myth: Israel is an apartheid state.

“Israel is an apartheid state.”

Apartheid was a legal system of racial caste. In Israel, Arab citizens vote, sit in the Knesset and on the Supreme Court, and practise law and medicine. The disputed West Bank measures are a security response to a territorial war, not a race law, and they don’t touch ‘Israel proper’ at all.

Origin of the claim

Section titled “Origin of the claim”

The word entered the conflict by way of the Soviet bloc, not South Africa. In November 1975 the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 3379, declaring “Zionism is a form of racism,” a Cold War measure pushed by the USSR and Arab states that the General Assembly itself revoked in December 1991 as its own error, by a vote of 111 to 25. The specific word “apartheid” attached to Israel later and more formally: in 2017 the UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), a body of 18 Arab member states, published a report by Richard Falk and Virginia Tilley concluding Israel had established an “apartheid regime.” UN Secretary-General António Guterres ordered it withdrawn from the UN website within days, and his spokesman said the report “does not reflect the views of the Secretary-General.” That rejection, at the UN’s own hands, is the claim’s actual origin story, not a footnote to it.

What apartheid actually means

Section titled “What apartheid actually means”

Apartheid is a defined legal term, not a mood. The 1973 International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid and Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court both require an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over another, maintained through inhuman acts committed with that specific purpose. South Africa’s version was a statute book: the Population Registration Act sorted every person by race at birth, the Group Areas Act criminalized living in the “wrong” zone, the Mixed Marriages Act and Immorality Act banned interracial relationships, and pass laws controlled Black South Africans’ movement inside their own country, all law by law, race by race. Israel has no equivalent statute. No law bars an Arab citizen from voting, owning property, marrying whom they choose, practicing a profession, or living in Tel Aviv, Haifa, or Jerusalem.

The record inside Israel

Section titled “The record inside Israel”

Arab citizens, roughly a fifth of Israel’s population, vote in every election and have sat in the Knesset since its first session in 1949, currently across parties spanning Islamist, secular, and mixed Jewish-Arab lists. Arab justices, including Salim Joubran and George Karra, have sat on Israel’s Supreme Court, the same court that has ruled against the government on security-barrier routing and land seizures. Arab doctors, at teaching hospitals like Hadassah and Rambam, treat Jewish patients and vice versa as a matter of routine, not exception. None of that is what a caste system looks like; it is what a flawed but genuine liberal democracy with a large minority looks like, complete with real disparities in funding and real arguments about them, argued out in the same Knesset and the same courts open to everyone.

The West Bank: a security regime, not a race law

Section titled “The West Bank: a security regime, not a race law”

The claim gets its actual traction from the West Bank, where Israeli citizens and Palestinian residents live under different legal systems in the same territory. That asymmetry is real. It traces to the unresolved status of land Israel captured in a defensive war in 1967 and never annexed, administered since the 1995 Oslo II accords under a patchwork of Areas A, B, and C, with security responsibility split between the Palestinian Authority and Israel by negotiated agreement, not by anyone’s race. Palestinians in the West Bank are not Israeli citizens and don’t vote for the Knesset that can affect their lives, a genuine grievance rooted in the absence of a peace settlement or annexation, not in a law forbidding them citizenship on racial grounds; a Jewish or Arab citizen of Israel who moves to the West Bank keeps full citizenship regardless of ethnicity. The security barrier, roughly 90 percent fence and 10 percent concrete wall, was built after suicide bombings that killed hundreds of Israelis during the Second Intifada, and its route has been repeatedly struck down and rerouted by Israel’s own Supreme Court, in Beit Sourik (2004) and Abu Safiyeh (2009), rulings apartheid states do not hand their own subjects.

Who pushes it today

Section titled “Who pushes it today”

Human Rights Watch made the charge formal in April 2021 with “A Threshold Crossed,” a 213-page report alleging Israeli policy amounts to the crimes of apartheid and persecution; Amnesty International followed in February 2022 with “Israel’s Apartheid Against Palestinians.” UN Special Rapporteurs, campus BDS chapters, and activist NGOs have repeated the word since as settled fact. It remains a minority position among governments: the United States, the UK, Germany, and most of the EU reject the apartheid designation, and no international court has applied the Apartheid Convention’s legal test to Israel and found it met.

Section titled “Related pages”

Sources

Section titled “Sources”